IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:04.02.2026 Noordin alias Nooruddin Noor ...Petitioner Versus Aaisha and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Yashvardhan Goyal, Advocate with Mr. Amyia Malhotra, Advocate for petitioner.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Petitioner-defendant No.4 is aggrieved by impugned order dated

06.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nuh, Haryana, whereby application under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) preferred by petitioner-defendant No.4 for rejection of plaint was dismissed.

2. Petitioner-defendant No.4 has sought rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground that since plaintiff No.4 was impleaded through his wife namely Smt. Sahina, claiming him to be of unsound mind, which is a false plea taken up by plaintiff No.4 in order to avoid his liability being one of the attesting witnesses to the transfer deed in favour of defendant No.4, therefore, suit is liable to be rejected. In other words, it is the case of petitioner-defendant No.4 that plaintiff No.4 is faking to be of unsound mind, whereas he is a person with fit stat