SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1748

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAT NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
BAHADUR SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1123-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 04.02.2026 SAT NARAYAN ....PETITIONER VERSUS BAHADUR SINGH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.10.2025 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur, vide which the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, moved by defendant No.1/respondent for amendment of written statement as well as counter claim has been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that facts of the case have not been correctly appreciated while allowing the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. Rather, false facts have been pleaded in the application seeking amendment alleging that defendant No.1/respondent has been forcibly dispossessed from the suit property in the month of July 2024. Infact, defendant was never in possession of the suit property which is in the occupation of plaintiff since long. The Local Commissioner was also appointed who has given his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top