SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1771

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PURAN – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. – Respondent


204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19457-2007 Date of decision: 03.02.2026 PURAN ....Petitioner Versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Karamjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J (Oral):

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside impugned order dated 19.12.2005(Annexure P-9) whereby the claims for regularisation of the services of the deceased father of the petitioner namely Bhagwan Dass and grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner were rejected. A prayer is also made for issuance of a writ of mandamus is sought directing the respondents to treat the deceased as deemed to have been regularized and further grant the petitioner compassionate appointment in lieu of the same.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the late father of the petitioner-Bhagwan Dass was engaged by the respondents on TMR/Daily Wage basis in April 1994 and had rendered continuous and unin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top