SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1773

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 03.02.2026 Surinder Kumar and others …..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, D.A.G., Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 23.03.2020 (Annexure P-6), whereby the claim of the petitioners for rectification of anomaly in the pay scale of Drivers vis-a-vis Clerks/Patwaris and for grant of pay band of Rs.10,300-34,800/- + Grade Pay Rs.3,200/- has been rejected. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant the petitioners the pay band of Rs.10,300-34,800/- + Grade Pay Rs.3,200/- at par with Clerks/Patwaris w.e.f. 01.12.2011 along with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary/pension with interest @ 12% per annum.

2. Brief facts, as have been pleaded in the petition, are that the petitioners are retired employees of the respondent-dep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top