IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

1. CRA-S-1338-SB-2004 (i) DEEPAK KUMAR @ BOBBY (SINCE DECEASED)

(ii) PARVINDER KUMAR @ PAMMI ...Appellants VERSUS U.T. CHANDIGARH ...Respondent And

2. CRA-S-1304-SB-2004 AMARJEET SINGH @ HAPPY ...Appellant VERSUS U.T. CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 30.10.2025 Pronounced on: 3.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 06.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Vansh Chawla, Advocate for the appellant (in CRA-S-1338-SB-2004).

Mr. Rohit Kumar, Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant (in CRA-S-1304-SB-2004).

Mr. Rajiv Vij, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-UT, Chandigarh.

****

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

both the parties Analysis & conclusion 18-27

1. This common order shall dispose of aforesaid two appeal since common questions of facts and law are involved in the same. For the sake of convenience, facts are being extracted from CRA-S-1338-SB-2024.

Instant appeal is directed against impugned j