IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 14.11.2025 Pronounced on: 11.02.2026 Uploaded on: 11.02.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full Judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment NARINDER CHUGH …PETITIONER VS.

STATE BANK OF INDIA ... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate (Arguing Counsel)

and Mr. Harkirat S. Jagdev, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for respondent.

*****

SANJIV BERRY, J.

1. The instant Writ Petition has been preferred under Articles 226/227of the Constitution of India seeking writ in the nature of Certiorari, for quashing of minutes of meeting of Fraud Identification Committee dated 21.06.2024 (Annexure P-13) and its communication dated 12.07.2024 (Annexure P-12) issued by the respondent, whereby the petitioner was declared fraud, besides seeking quashing of all consequential proceedings initiated on account of such declaration.

2. Briefly stating the facts of the case are that the petitioner had rich experience on issues pertaining to international trade for over last two decades. M/s Rama Krishna Knit