SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1838

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASKARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :11.02.2026 Jaskaran Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Ms. Srishti S. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. K.P.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

1. The petitioner, who is facing trial for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, vide FIR 37 dated 02.07.2024, lodged in Police Station SSOC District Amritsar, is in custody.

2. This petition for interim bail has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that marriage of his sister is scheduled to take place tomorrow, i.e. on

12.02.2026.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Since advance notice has already been served, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab, appears on behalf of respondent-State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with.

5. The learned State Counsel has filed custody certificate of the petitioner. The same be taken on record.

6. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the purpose of interim bail the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top