SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUSKAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, the following legal points can be identified:

  1. Jurisdiction and Court Authority: The case was decided by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, indicating that the court has jurisdiction over the matter and the authority to hear and decide the issues involved (!) .

  2. Parties Involved: The appellants are Muskan and another, while the respondents include the State of Punjab and others. The case involves a dispute or matter initiated by the appellants against the State and related parties (!) .

  3. Nature of the Appeal: As an appeal case, the legal points likely involve the examination of the decision or judgment passed by a lower court or tribunal, questioning its correctness or legality (!) .

  4. Legal Grounds for Appeal: The appeal may involve issues such as procedural irregularities, misinterpretation of law, or errors in the judgment that warrant appellate review (!) .

  5. Decisional Date and Implications: The case was decided on February 11, 2026, which may influence the current legal standing or the applicability of legal principles based on the law as it stood at that time (!) .

  6. Legal Principles Applied: Although specific case law is not cited, the decision likely rests on principles of constitutional law, procedural fairness, and substantive rights, depending on the nature of the dispute (!) .

  7. Remedies and Orders: The court's decision could include directions for further action, modifications of previous judgments, or affirmations of the earlier decision, depending on the issues raised (!) .

Please note that these points are inferred based on the case details provided and general legal principles applicable to appellate cases in the jurisdiction.


111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :11.02.2026 Muskan and Another ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and Others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate for the petitioners -.-

MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, who are none other than the family members of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks protection of life and liberty of the petitioners by contending that both of them are major and are living together in a ‘live-in relationship’ against the wishes of the private respondents and seek appropriate protection from the authorities. Petitioner No.2 is already married to some other person, however, is now living with petitioner No.1 in a ‘live-in relationship’.They have submitted a representation dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) in this regard to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Ferozepur, but a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top