Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J
Satbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought to overturn punishments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal standards of proportionality in punishment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court restored increments and set aside adverse remarks. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP No.14397 of 2015.
2. The petitioner (in CWP No. 14397 of 2015) is seeking setting aside of orders passed by departmental authorities whereby he was awarded punishment of stoppage of three annual increments with permanent effect. In CWP No.32291 of 2019, he is seeking setting aside of adverse remarks recorded in his Annual Confidential Report (‘ACR’) for the period from 2006-2007.
3. The petitioner joined Police Force as Constable on 03.10.1989. He was promoted from time to time. In 2006, the respondent initiated departmental inquiry against him alleging that he has forged signatures and stamp of District Inspector. At that point of time, he was posted as Reader of the District Inspector of Police, Narnaul. The said office was concerned with registration of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
