SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1848

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:10.02.2026 Nar Singh ….Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ambika Luthra, Addl. A.G., Haryana ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 is seeking direction to respondents to release his retiral dues.

2. The petitioner joined Haryana Police Force as Assistant Sub- Inspector on 12.06.1998. He was promoted from time to time. He retired from the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) on 31.10.2024. He served legal notice dated 03.09.2025 for not releasing his retiral benefits. Commandant, 1st IRB, Bondsi, Gurugram vide letter dated 19.09.2025 informed him that his financial benefits are linked with District Police, Sonipat, thus copy of his legal notice was forwarded to Commissioner of Police, Sonipat. He served legal notice dated 01.10.2025 upon Commissioner of Police, Sonipat to do the needful.

3. Reply by way of affidavit dated 09.02.2026 of Sh. Simrandeep Singh, IPS, Officiating Commissioner of Polic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top