SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1858

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURNAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MITHU SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10.02.2026 GURNAM SINGH .... Petitioner VERSUS MITHU SINGH AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Ms. Harmeet, Advocate for Mr. Aarish Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fazilka whereby an application filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of a Local Commissioner before the Executing Court was dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the petitioner herein had filed a civil suit bearing No.61 dated 17.08.2015 titled as ‘Gurnam Singh V/s Mithu Singh etc.’ for permanent injunction for restraining the respondents and others from interfering into his peaceful possession over the plot/house as fully described in the plaint therein. The defendants therein appeared and filed written statement-cum-counterclaim. In the counterclaim, injunction sought was for restraining the petitioner herein from causing forcible, illegal and unauthorized interfere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top