SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP VARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep Verma ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ….Respondents Date of Decision: February 10, 2026 Date of Uploading: February 10, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Sarun Hans, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

The present criminal revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 21/26.02.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Tohana, in a complaint case, whereby the petitioner has been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 02 years and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.6,00,000/- to the complainant. Further, the petitioner has laid challenge to the impugned judgment dated 05.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad, in Criminal Appeal No.CRA-79/2018, whereby appeal preferred by the petitioner against the judgment and order dated 21/26.02.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Tohana, was dismi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top