SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1883

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HEMANT CHOPRA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHOPRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

106 (I) CWP-30908-2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision : February 09, 2026 HEMANT CHOPRA AND ANOTHER -PETITIONERS V/S SUBHASH CHOPRA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS (II) CWP-652-2026 SUBHASH CHOPRA -PETITIONER V/S HEMANT CHOPRA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Advocate, with Ms. Manvi Singh, Advocate, and Ms. Anakshi Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-30908-2025) and for the (respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP-652-2026).

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chopra, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner (in CWP-652-2026) and for the respondent No.1 (in CWP-30908-2025).

Mr. Jabar Jeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.4- ICICI Bank (in CWP-30908-2025).

***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

1. The amenability of both these writ petitions for being decided through a common verdict generates from theirs involving common parties, besides encompassing common facts and issues for adjudication. For the sake of convenience and clarity, Mr. Subhash Chopra (petitioner in CWP- 652-2026 and respondent No.1 in CWP-30908-2025) shall hereinafter be referred to as the “senior citizen”, while Mr. Hem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top