IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision.:09.02.2026 Arvinder Kaur …..Pe11oner Vs.

Nirmal Singh and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Pooja Rana, Advocate for Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the pe(cid:26)(cid:26)oner.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The pe(cid:26)(cid:26)oner herein is one of the plain(cid:26)ffs in civil suit bearing No. CS-319-2021 (cid:26)tled “Amarjit Kaur and others versus Nirmal Singh and others”, pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Batala. She has approached this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby an applica(cid:26)on filed by the defendants under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment of the wri9en statement was allowed, subject to payment of costs.

2. The suit has been ins(cid:26)tuted by the pe(cid:26)(cid:26)oner along with two other plain(cid:26)ffs seeking a decree of permanent injunc(cid:26)on restraining the defendants from interfering in their alleged possession over the suit land, which is claimed to be owned by the plain(cid:26)ffs. The defendants contested the suit by asser(cid:26)ng that