SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGDISH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CW-59-2026 in/and CWP No.2134 of 2004 Date of Decision:04.02.2026 Jagdish Chander deceased through LRs ….Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ambika Luthra, Addl. A.G., Haryana ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

RA-CW-59-2026 The applicant-petitioner through instant application is seeking review of order dated 11.11.2025 and to restore the main petition to its original number and stage.

For the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed.

The main case is restored to its original number and stage.

With the consent of both sides, the main case is taken on Board.

Main case

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders whereby he was dismissed from service.

2. The petitioner was holding rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector at the time of passing impugned order dated 28.07.2003. A team of police officers was deputed to produce two hardcore criminals before the Trial Court. Two unidentified boys attacked the undertrial prisoners. One u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top