SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJVEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3365-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 11.02.2026 Rajveer ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Kuljit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. Sarbuland Singh Mann, Advocate for respondent No.4.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to release the remaining amount of service-cum-retirement dues of the petitioner, such as Provident Fund, revised Pay Scale, Arrears of revised pay scale benefits of 01.01.2016, and all other benefits along with interest for delayed period, qua which a legal notice dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) has also been served by the petitioner. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondents to release all the aforesaid service-cum-retirement benefits along with interest for delayed period.

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that all admissible ret

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top