IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (114 Date of Decision:-11.02.2026 SUBHASH CHANDER … Petitioner Versus DINESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. This civil revision petition has been instituted by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to assail the order dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P- 5), whereby the learned Trial Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the respondent–plaintiff had failed to affix the requisite court fee.

2. The respondent–plaintiff instituted a suit for recovery of a sum ₹

of 6,25,000/- along with interest, by creation of a charge on the property of the proforma respondent and by seeking a restraint against alienation of the suit land during the pendency of the suit. The suit was founded on the plea that the parties had entered into an agreement to sell, pursuant to ₹

which a sum of 4,50,000/- was paid, with a further amount agreed to be