IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sandeep alias Badal through his mother ......Appellant Vs.

Sunder Singh and Others ......Respondents Reserved on: 09.02.2026 Pronounced on: 11.02.2026 Uploaded on: 12.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ankit Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 13.04.2018 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sirsa (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellant/claimant to the tune of Rs.18,11,200/- along with interest @9% per annum on account of injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant – Sandeep alias Badal in a motor vehicular accident, occurred on 03.09.2016.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Trib