SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHDEV RAM ALIAS SUKHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :13.02.2026 Sukhdev Ram @ Sukha .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr.Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab -.-

MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)

This is the second petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 27 dated 24.03.2024, registered under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, 1860 (subsequently Sections 396 and 120-B IPC, 1860 added), at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda.

As per the prosecution case, the present FIR was initially registered against unknown persons on the statement of Harwinder Kaur regarding the murder of her husband. Subsequently, during investigation, the supplementary statement of Manjit Singh, brother of the deceased, was recorded, wherein he alleged that on 22.03.2024, the present petitioner Sukhdev Ram @ Sukha along with co-accused namely Harpreet Singh @ Dhakkan, Baljit Singh @ Billa, Baljit Ram @ Ballu and Harjit @ Sultan were involved in the occurrence. It was alleged that the accused persons ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top