SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASMER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jasmer Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 09.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 13.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 13.02.2026 website

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Yagsimant Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

Mr. Suresh Nain, Advocate, for the complainant.

***

MANISHA BATRA , J.

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR mentioned below:-

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

725 03.08.2025 Panipat City,108 and 308 of the District Panipat Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”)

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top