IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106)

Date of Decision:-13.02.2026 SANDEEP … Petitioner Versus SATBIR AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

V IRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 03.05.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bahadurgarh, whereby, the application filed by petitioner for additional evidence was dismissed. In fact respondents No.3 and 4 filed a suit for possession by way of partition against the petitioner and others. The learned trial Court passed an order dated 21.03.2022 directing the parties to maintain status quo qua construction and possession as per their share. Respondents No.1 to 4 violated the order. Petitioner and respondent No.5 initiated proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2A of CPC. During the pendency of those proceedings. After conclusion of evidence of the petitioner, respondent also concluded the evidence. Thereafter, an application was filed by petitioner for seeking permissi