Court. The record of the trial Court, as available on the Document Management System (DMS), has been duly perused.

3. Pleadings : A perusal of the pleadings reveals that the plain! had ini!ally ins!tuted a civil suit seeking a decree of permanent injunc!on so as to restrain defendant Nos. 1 to 3 from aliena!ng the suit land situated within the revenue estate of village Bhadaur, Tehsil and District Panipat, in favour of the defendants or any other person. During the pendency of the suit, the suit land was sold and leased out. Consequently, the plaint was amended and addi!onal relief was claimed, seeking a declara!on to the effect that the sale deed dated 27.11.1984 and the lease deed dated 29.05.1985, executed by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of defendant Nos.

5, 6, and 8 to 15, are null, illegal and void.

4.1 According to the plain!ffs, they are co-sharers and co-owners of the suit land measuring 38 kanal 11 marla, as detailed in the head-note of the plaint. It was pleaded that their forefathers were the real owners of the suit property, which had been given to one Phulla, the father-in-law of defendant No. 1, in Dholi. The plain!ffs claimed that they have now become owners by w