SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM PARSAD AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SUDHEER KUMAR AND ORS. – Respondent


241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 12.02.2026 Ram Parsad and Another ... Appellants Versus Sudheer Kumar and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Ms. Mansi Majoka, Advocate for Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advoate for the appellants.

Ms. Geetika Rani, Advocate for Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

CM-13176-CII-2019 & CM-13177-CII-2019

1. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. The delay of 38 days in filing and 41 days in re-filing the present appeal is condoned.

FAO-3829-2019

2. Present appeal has been preferred by the claimant-appellants aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) vide award dated 18.09.2018 on account of death of Pappi Devi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’), which took place on 15.11.2017.

3. Since the factum of the accident is not in dispute, the facts are not being adverted to herein for the sake of brevity.

4. The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following compensation :

Sr. No. Heads Compensation Awarded
1 Month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top