IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 12.02.2026 FAO-4303-2024(O&M)

Chaman ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Ramesh Kumar & Another ...Respondent(s)

***

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Parminder Walia, Advocate for the appellant.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-15734-CII-2024 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 414 days in filing the appeal.

The reason given in the application seeking condonation of delay of 414 days is contained in Para 3 of the application, which is as under:-

“3. That the Impugned Award passed by Ld. MACT, Panchkula dated 19.04.2023 and the appeal was not filed within the limitation period was due to the reason that the Appellant was in the impression that the 90 days has to be calculated from the date of receiving the money from the Insurance Company. It is pertinent to mention here that the Appellant has received compensation amount in the month of June, 2024 and he was in the impression that 90 days calculated from that day only moreover, due to shortage of funds for filing the appeal before this Hon'ble Court, the Appellant could not approach the counsel within the period of limitation.”

The above cited reason is vague and does not constitute sufficient cause to condone extraordinary delay of 414 days in filing the present appeal. It is cardinal principle of law that delay of each day has to be explained. In this regard, reliance may also be placed upon recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Shivamma (Dead) by LRs Vs. Karnataka Housing Board & Others” Civil Appeal No.11794 of 2025 decided on 12.09.2025. As such, no ground is made out for condoning inordinate delay of 414 days. Present application accordingly stands dismissed MAIN CASE Present appeal has been filed by injured-claimant seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.2,22,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide Award dated 19.04.2023 passed in MACP Case No.162 dated 21.12.2019 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”).

2. Brief facts of the case are that the ld. Tribunal on the basis of pleadings and oral & documentary evidence adduced by the parties, concluded that the appellant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 15.07.2019 due to the rash and negligent driving of motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-49-G-8770 (hereinafter “the offending vehicle”) being driven by and owned by respondent No.1 and insured by respondent No.2. The said compensation has been awarded along with interest @ 6% per annum. Respondents were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation amount.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks enhancement of compensation by submitting that in the accident in question, the appellant has suffered 10% permanent disability as is evident from the Disability Certificate (Ex.P-37) which was duly proved on record by the appellant. Yet the learned Tribunal has awarded only Rs.20,000/- towards disability compensation. It is further submitted that prior to the accident, the appellant was working in a liquor shop and earning Rs.20,000/- per month. Due to the injuries suffered in the accident, the appellant had remained bedridden for eight months. Yet the learned Tribunal has awarded loss of income to the appellant only for a period of 4 months. It is submitted that the appellant had even required the services of an Attendant during his confinement period. However, nothing has been awarded towards Attendant Charges. Even nothing has been awarded towards Ambulance Charges. It is further submitted that interest should have been awarded @

18%. Ld. counsel accordingly prays for modification of impugned Award.

4. No other argument is made on behalf of the appellant. I have heard learned counsel and perused the case file in detail. I find no merit in the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellant.

5. As per the Claim Petition, i