270 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.02.2026 VINAY SHARMA AND ORS .... Petitioners VERSUS RISHI KISHAN AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 08.02.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandigarh whereby an application filed by the plaintiff- respondent No.1 under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was allowed and the witnesses PW4 and PW2 have been allowed to be recalled and re-examined.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff- respondent No.1 filed a suit for declaration claiming that he is owner in possession of 50% share in House No.3063, Sector-37D, Chandigarh on the basis of the registered Will dated 24.08.1999 as also for permanent injunction and recovery of a sum of ₹1,52,000 received as rent by defendants No.2 and 3 (petitioner