IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (221 Date of Decision:-11.02.2026 MAM RAJ (DECEASED) THROUGH LR … Appellants Versus OM PARKASH AND OTHERS ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents (through video conferencing)

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellant–plaintiff assailing the judgment and decree dated 17.05.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jagadhri, whereby the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court were affirmed. The learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagadhri, vide judgment and decree dated 17.09.1996, had dismissed the suit instituted by the appellant–plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction. The appellant now calls in question the concurrent findings of both the learned Courts below as being legally unsustainable and factually erroneous.

2. The plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent injunction, asserting co-ownership to the extent of one-half share in the suit property, having purch