SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB STATE & ANOTHER – Respondent


dated 28.09.1999 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur (for short, “Reference Court”), whereby, reference petition preferred at the instance of landowner invoking Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, “1894 Act”), was partly allowed.

3. Brief facts of the case are that some land owned by the appellant-landowner, situated in the revenue estate of Village Roran, District Hoshiarpur, was acquired vide notifications dated 23.02.1989 and 30.03.1989, issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the 1894 Act, for the public purpose namely, “proposed Kandhi canal”. The Land Acquisition Collector vide its Award dated 22.03.1991, assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs.44.11 per marla for barani land, Rs.43.75 per marla for banjar qadin land and Rs.56.41 per marla for chahi land besides grant of other statutory benefits.

4. Feeling dissatisfied with the award passed by the Land Acquisition Collector, the landowner preferred reference petition under Section 18 of the 1894 Act, seeking enhancement of compensation. Upon consideration of the material available on record, the learned Reference Court vide its award dated 28.09.1999, part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top