SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KISHAN CHAND THROUGH LRS – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:10.02.2026 Kishan Chand (deceased) through L.Rs. ...Petitioner Versus Ramesh Chand ...Respondent CR-972-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision:10.02.2026 Kishan Chand (deceased) through L.Rs. ...Petitioner Versus Ramesh Chand and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ranjit Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Gopal Singh Nehal, Advocate for petitioner in both cases.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

Petitioner-defendant No.1 has preferred Civil Revision No. 983 of 2026 challenging impugned order dated 27.11.2025 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Palwal against dismissal of his application under Section 28(1) of Specific Relief Act. Civil Revision No.972 of 2026 has also been filed by petitioner challenging impugned order dated 27.11.2025, whereby application filed by respondent-decree holder for deposit of balance sale consideration and extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration amount, was allowed

2. Respondent-plaintiff Ramesh Chand had preferred a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 06.01.2006, wherein it was asserted that suit la

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top