SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGAT RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

CRR-2167-2007 (O&M) Reserved on:-04.02.2026 Pronounced on:- 10.02.2026 Uploaded on:-13.02.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Jagat Ram (since deceased) through LR ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG Punjab.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)

1. The present criminal revision has been preferred by the petitioner, against the judgment dated 22.10.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rupnanagar and judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 22.11.2004 passed by the Court of the learned Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Anandpur Sahib, in FIR No.6 dated 25.01.1999, registered under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 427 IPC at Police Station Nangal, whereby the petitioner was held guilty for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced as follows:

of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced as follows:

of the Indian Penal C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top