SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2272

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S PIONEER FACILITY MANAGEMENT LIMITEDD – Appellant
Versus
PRASOON SHRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


262 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-442-2025 Date of decision: 09.02.2026 M/S PIONEER FACILITY MANAGEMENT LIMITED ...Applicant(s)

VERSUS PRASOON SHRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)

1. The present application has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) seeking appointment of an independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences which have arisen between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there was an agreement between the parties vide Annexure P-1, wherein there exists a valid arbitration clause i.e. Clause 10(xx), which provides that in the event of any differences or disputes arising between the Maintenance Agency and the User in respect of any matter connected with the accuracy of bills, supply of services or interpretation of any of these terms and conditions which cannot be determined amicably, or settled through an agreement between the Maintenan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top