SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2313

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PT.DESRAJ PRABHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
M.C.LUDHIANA AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

206 Date of decision: 04.02.2026 Des Raj Prabhakar (deceased) through his LRs .....Appellant Versus Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court dated 28.01.1998, whereby the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1995 passed by the learned Trial Court has been set aside and the suit of the appellant/plaintiff has been dismissed. Parties to the lis hereinafter shall be referred to by their original position before the learned Trial Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff was working as Assistant Superintendent and was posted with the Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana. With effect from 01.07.1977, he was assigned the duties of the higher post of Superintendent, which he continued to discharge upto 06.09.1987. He was thereafter promoted on regular basis to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top