SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
GURPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


[137] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 03.02.2026 Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vikran Nigam and another …Appellants versus Gurpreet Singh and another ….Respondents Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. S.K. Mahajan, Advocate for the appellants.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

[1] Defendant is in appeal. For convenience the parties hereinafter are referred to as by their original position before the Court of First Instance i.e., the appellant as defendant and the respondent as plaintiff.

[2] The plaintiff instituted a suit seeking a decree of declaration to the effect that the checking report dated 20.09.2014, the demand raised vide memos No.1881 and 1882 both dated 28.10.2014, as well as the short assessment memo No.175 dated 06.07.2015, be declared illegal, null and void and not binding upon him. A further relief of permanent injunction was sought restraining the defendant from disconnecting the electricity connection of the plaintiff and from effecting recovery of the amount of ₹42,287/-.

[3] The plaintiff is a consumer of electricity supplied by the defendant. On 20.09.2014, the officials of the defendant department conducted a checking of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top