SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARPREET SINGH GHUMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 02.02.2026 Amarpreet Singh Ghuman …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. G.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate and Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 20.11.2017 whereby his counter-request for appointment to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police instead of Inspector was rejected.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Probationary Inspector on 21.10.2001 on compassionate grounds. Both of his parents died in a brutal terrorist attack on 27.12.1990 when he was 11 years old. He approached departmental authorities claiming post of Deputy Superintendent of Police which vide order dated 20.11.2017 rejected his claim. He has filed mercy petition before Director General of Police, Punjab. There are similarly situated employees who were granted better or more benefits on account of their parent’s sacrifice.

3. The impugned order was passed in No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top