SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUKESH KUMAR ALIAS MUKESH SAINI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

293 CRWP-12872-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.02.2026 Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Saini ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Ujwal Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. Through the instant petition, filed under Article 226of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has made prayer for setting aside the order dated 25.09.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by respondent No. 1-Inspector General of Prison, Chandigarh, whereby the application seeking grant of parole for 28 days had been rejected.

2. The petitioner has been convicted in case arising out of FIR No. 456 dated 30.12.2018, under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh and is undergoing rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years, vide judgment of conviction dated 27.11.2024. He has filed an appeal against the aforesaid judgment of conviction before this Court, which is pending.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has moved an application for gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top