IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. – Respondent
##PAGE1##
1
CWP-26602-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
202 CWP-26602-2013
Date of Decision: January 31, 2026
Baljit Singh
..Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Advocate with Mr. Gurlabh S. Bhaika
Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondent No.3.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus
directing the respondents to pay the arrears of salary as well as interest on
the same at the rate of 18% p.a. on account of delayed payment.
CONTENTIONS
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
joined service of respondent-Municipal Council, Sangat on 10.02.1986 daily
wage basis. The services of the petitioner were illegally terminated but the
Labour Court, Bathinda ordered him to be reinstated with continuity of
service. This award was challenged the respondent-Council before this
1 of 10
::: Downloaded on - 15-02-2026 20:16:06 :::
##PAGE2##2
CWP-26602-2013
Court by filing a writ petition, however, the same was withdrawn as the
petitioner was ordered to be regularised by resolution No.225 dated
23.02.2000 (Annexure P-2). Aggrieved by the delay in regularisation of his
service, in spite of the resolution (supra), the petitioner filed CWP No.4588
of 2001 before this Court praying for a direction to implement the resolution
(supra) with consequential benefits. During the pendency of the same, the
Executive Officer sent a letter dated 26.08.2011 to the petitioner requesting
him to withdraw the same, which he did as reflected in order dated
13.09.2011 (Annexure P-1). Thereafter, he was regularised vide office order
dated 01.11.2011 (Annexure P-9) as a pump operator. Considering the
resolution approving his regularisation was passed on 23.02.2000, the
petitioner requested the respondent-Council to pay him the arrears of salary
on regular scale from the said date. Vide letter dated 18.02.2013 (Annexure
P-3), the Executive Officer informed the petitioner that he would be paid
arrears of salary after deducting the amount paid to him as wages as well as
the towards the P.F. within a period of 03 months. In spite of order dated
18.02.2013 (Annexure P-3) and various representations, the petitioner has
not been paid the arrears on account of difference in salary.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent-Council submits
that the operation of resolution (supra) was stayed by the competent
authority owing to the fact that the petitioner did not hold the requisite ITI
diploma. The resolution No.225 dated 23.02.2000 was stayed by the
Director, Local Government, being the competent authority, for lack of the
said technical qualification, causing the petitioner to file CWP No.4588 of
2 of 10
::: Downloaded on - 15-02-2026 20:16:06 :::
##PAGE3##3
CWP-26602-2013
2001. Thereafter, vide resolution No.33 dated 28.01.2008, the services of the
petitioner were regularised on humanitarian grounds as well as in view of
the experience gained by him. Furthermore, the petitioner surrendered his
claim to the arrears by giving an affidavit dated 27.08.2008 (Annexure R-
3/3) in terms with the order dated 01.11.2011 (Annexure P-9), which is not
under challenge. The petitioner was permitted to take benefit of his earlier
service vide letter dated 18.02.2013 (Annexure P-3) sent by the Executive
Officer, however, it was subsequently found to be forged. Moreover, the
Executive Officer did not have to authority to make such an order, causing
the General Body of the respondent-Council to set aside letter dated
18.02.2013 (Annexure P-3) vide resolution dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure R-
3/1).
OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing
the record, it transpires that the petitioner has been serving the respondent-
Council since 10.02.1986 and was initially orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.