SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2385

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHIV KUMAR ALIAS PURAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

CRM-M-5447-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 31.01.2026 Shiv Kumar @ Puran ....Petitioner VERSUS State of U.T.Chandigarh ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Deepak Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of impugned order dated 23.01.2026 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh whereby, the bail of the petitioner has been cancelled and his bail bonds/surety bonds have been forfeited to the State followed by issuance of non-bailable warrants of arrest.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted the concession of regular bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, vide order dated 11.09.2025. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the learned Trial Court. However, on 23.01.2026, the petitioner could not appear before the learned Trial Court due to an inadvertent bona fide mistake, as he had noted an incorrect date telephonically as conveyed by the clerk of his counsel. Consequently, the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top