113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 Sewak Patta ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Ms.Pooja Dhingra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 31.10.2025 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bathinda, vide which application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed in a case FIR No.111 dated 11.12.2022, registered under Sections 302, 307, 459, 460, 458, 411 and 34 IPC, at Police Station Thermal Bathinda.

2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been prosecuted in FIR No.111 dated 11.12.2022. It is submitted that earlier the Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioner though cross- examined witnesses PW-1 (Nisha Kansal) and PW-3 (Vikas Goyal), however, some relevant questions were not put by him. It is submitted that now the petitioner has changed his counsel and wants to further cross- examine these two witnesses, hence, application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was filed by the petitioner. It is