SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEERU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: 28.01.2026 Neeru . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Chadha, Advocate and Mr. Jagraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL)

CM-1198-2026 For the reasons stated, the application is allowed, and amended memo of parties is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

CWP-934-2026 The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents to consider the petitioner's candidature for appointment as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) English pursuant to advertisement 2/2023, dated 21.02.2023, Annexure P-1, under the BC-B category. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner applied for the post in question as a BC-B category candidate in response to the aforementioned advertisement, but she failed to upload a valid certificate establishing her credentials as a candidate belonging to the said category, and by mistake uploaded a domicile/resident cer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top