IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEERU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: 28.01.2026 Neeru . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Chadha, Advocate and Mr. Jagraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL)
CM-1198-2026 For the reasons stated, the application is allowed, and amended memo of parties is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
CWP-934-2026 The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents to consider the petitioner's candidature for appointment as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) English pursuant to advertisement 2/2023, dated 21.02.2023, Annexure P-1, under the BC-B category. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner applied for the post in question as a BC-B category candidate in response to the aforementioned advertisement, but she failed to upload a valid certificate establishing her credentials as a candidate belonging to the said category, and by mistake uploaded a domicile/resident cer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.