IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

RSA-1046-2022(O&M)

Date of decision: 28.01.2026 SAVITRI DEVI . . . . Appellant Vs.

Daulat Ram and others . . . . Respondents ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA ****

Present: - Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate, for the appellant.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

This Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiff, assailing the concurrent findings of the Courts below, whereby the relief of permanent injunction sought by him has been declined.

2. The factual matrix, as borne out from the record, is that the plaintiff instituted a suit claiming himself to be owner in possession of the suit land on the basis of a sale deed bearing Vasika No.2106 dated 02.07.2009, followed by mutation No.3041 dated 05.04.2010. It was pleaded that in terms of the sale deed, possession of a specific portion of the suit land, delineated by letters ABCD and shown in blue colour in the site plan appended with the plaint, had been delivered to her. According to the plaintiff, the defendants had no concern with the said portion, yet the revenue record continued to reflect their names, prompting him to seek correction of the same. On refusal by the defendants