IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RAJINDER SINGH ..Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

..Respondents Reserved on: 13.11.2025 Date of decision: 28.01.2026 Uploaded on: 31.01.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Anshul Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 31.03.2004, passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hisar, whereby, the civil suit filed by the appellant was dismissed as well as judgment and decree dated 22.05.2006, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Hisar, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings in the civil suit are that the appellant/plaintiff was appointed on the post of Horticulture and Floriculture Instructor by the Director of Industrial Training and Vocational Education, Haryana, Chandigarh on the recommendations of the Services Selection Board Haryana vide No. TE/153/22/13087 date