IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 27.01.2026 Satbir ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Rameshwar and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Defendant No.1 is in Second Appeal against the judgment of reversal; whereby suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents No.1 and 2 herein for mandatory injunction alongwith consequential relief of permanent injunction, although dismissed by learned Trial Court, has been decreed by the First Appellate Court.

2. The pleaded case of the plaintiffs/respondents No.1 and 2 herein, is that they are the owners in possession in equal shares of plot measuring 6M, in Khasra No. 99 as gair mumkin plot (hereinafter referred to as “suit land”) as described in the plaint. It was alleged that defendants No.1 and 2 in association with other persons are bent upon illegally occupying the suit property. It was further alleged that defendant No.3 Gram Panchayat had encroached upon the suit property to the extent of area measuring 54 x 13 sq.ft. by constructing rasta upon the same as per Demarcation