IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHIT GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mohit Goyal ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana ... Respondent 1. The date when the judgment is reserved 11.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 16.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 16.02.2026 website
4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced
5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mandeep Budhiraja, Advocate and Mr. Rehan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Arun Kumar Goyat, Advocate for the complainant.
...
Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).
1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking pre- arrest bail in case arising out of FIR No.296, dated 28.08.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420, 409, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines Jind, District Jind, on the basis of a written complaint submitted by complainant – Rajender Singh, alleging that in the year 2021, he had opened two savings bank accounts in the name of his wife and himself
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.