IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119)

Date of Decision:-11.02.2026 RANJOT SINGH … Appellant Versus WAZIR SINGH ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate; Mr.Rahul Gugnani, Advocate &

Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocate for Caveator/Respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellant–plaintiff assailing the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fatehabad, whereby the findings of the learned Trial Court were affirmed. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tohana, vide judgment and decree dated 04.02.2019, had dismissed the suit filed by the appellant–plaintiff seeking permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction. The appellant calls in question the concurrent findings of both Courts below as being legally unsustainable and factually erroneous.

2. The plaintiff asserts continuous possession of the suit property for the past 50–60 years and claims exclusive ownership and possession thereof, denying any right, title, or