IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) CM-1490-CWP-2026 in/and RA-CW-55-2026 in CWP-889-2024 Date of Decision : February 11, 2026 Sunil Kumar .. Applicant-Petitioner Versus State of Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate, for respondents-UT, Chandigarh.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
CM-1490-CWP-2026 Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 39 days in filing the review application i.e. RA-CW-55-2026. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 39 days in filing the review application is condoned.
RA-CW-55-2026
1. Present review application has been filed for review of the order dated 19.11.2025 passed in CWP No.889 of 2024.
2. In the present review application, the prayer being raised by the applicant-petitioner is that the post of Clerk is lying vacant and therefore, it is incumbent upon the respondents to consider the claim of the applicant-
petitioner in a time bo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.