SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

126 CWP-3714-2026 Date of Decision: February 09, 2026 Suresh Kumar .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Udayveer Singh with Mr. Amit Khari, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondent to consider the petitioner for regular/permanent employment in accordance with the applicable policy of the Haryana Government and further praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to take the appropriate decision on the representation dated 15.09.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby no action had been taken on the grievance of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner was appointed as a Truck Driver on DC rates w.e.f. 12.09.2006 against a sanctioned vacant post in the resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top