IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 09.02.2026 Naurang Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ravinder Goel, Advocate and Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, A.A.G., Haryana.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below; whereby suit filed by the appellant for permanent injunction, has been dismissed with costs by both the Courts below.

2. It was pleaded in the plaint that plaintiff is having 6 shops on the agricultural land/suit property. It was averred that plaintiff was tenant over the said land for the last more than 30 years. As he was having good relations with previous owners, plaintiff had purchased the land from the previous owners vide Sale Deed dated 08.10.2002 for valuable sale consideration of Rs.2,56,000/-. After purchasing the land, plaintiff had constructed the above shops. Mutation No. 172 was sanctioned in favour of the plaintiff with regard to the above land. The road near shops was constructed more than 30 years ago after demarcation; a