SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2798

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURDITA SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.8 of 2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Gurdita Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *****

Present: Mr. Ranbir Singh Sekhon, Advocate and Ms. Sangeeta Devi, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Amritsar, vide which the application filed by the petitioner under Section 187(3) BNSS (earlier Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.) for the grant of default bail was declined and the impugned order dated 06.12.2025 whereby the application filed by the prosecution for extension of time for filing the challan under Section 36(A)(4) of NDPS Act in a case bearing FIR No.164, dated 07.06.2025, under Sections 21(c), 25, 29, 61, 85 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Gharinda, Amitsar was allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in case bearing FIR No.164, dated 07.06.2025, under Sections 21(c), 25, 29, 61, 85 of NDPS Act, registered

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top