SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHIT @ JULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

317 CRA-S-3770-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision:16.02.2026 Mohit @ Julla ... Appellant Vs.

State of Haryana & another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Mayur Karkra, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for respondent No.2.

...

Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).

The Instant Appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’) by the appellant, thereby challenging order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal, in case arising out of FIR No.306, dated 25.09.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 190, 191(3), 351(3), 117(2) of the BNS and Sections 3(2) (va), 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act at Police Station City Kaithal, whereby an application filed by the appellant for grant of regular bail was dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of written complaint submitted by complainant – Mohit Kumar, alleging that on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top