IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INDIAN BANK CHD THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER AND CONSTITUTED AUTORNEY SH. NISHANT SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAITHAL – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1951 of 2024(O&M)
Date of decision: 12.02.2026 INDIAN BANK CHD THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER AND CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SH. NISHANT SHUKLA …….Petitioners.
V/S DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAITHAL … Respondents [
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE Present: Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
****
SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
CM-2152-CWP-2026 This application for placing on record the affidavit filed before the District Magistrate, Kaithal, and other relevant orders (Annexures P-9 to P-14) is considered and allowed.
Main Case
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/Bank challenging the order dated 04.01.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by the District Magistrate, Kaithal u/s 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the SARFAESI Act’). One of the grounds taken by the petitioner/Bank is that the District Magistrate, Kaithal, while exercising powers u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act, has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.