SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2877

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RANJIT KAUR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (117)

Date of Decision:-12.02.2026 JOGINDER SINGH … Petitioner Versus RANJIT KAUR ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been instituted by the petitioner/respondent assailing the order dated 05.11.2022 passed by the learned Rent Controller and the order dated 08.10.2025 rendered by the learned Appellate Authority, whereby the ejectment petition filed by the respondent/petitioner was allowed and the petitioner/respondent was directed to hand over vacant possession of the demised shop on the ground of bona fide personal necessity.

2. Briefly stated, the respondent/petitioner instituted a petition under Section 13 of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 seeking ejectment of the petitioner/respondent from the demised shop. It was pleaded that the respondents were inducted as tenants at a monthly rent of ₹

1,700/- and had fallen into arrears of rent with effect from 01.05.2023. It was further averred that the demised premises were required for the bona fide personal necessity o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top